This particular topic is one that has bugged me for a while. It only seems to become an issue when I’m involved in an online conversation, however, which suggests to me that part of the problem is that written communication is more difficult to get this particular point across. When I have the opportunity to discuss this with teachers and players in person, we almost always immediately come to an agreement.
What I’m talking about here is the difference between two extreme pedagogical approaches to music. On one end there are teachers who advocate imitation as the most important part of the learning process. The gist of this idea is if you play for and along with your students, and get them to imitate the sounds they hear, they will figure out what their bodies need to do on their own, without resorting to instruction on exactly how to form the embouchure, manipulate the tongue, etc. As evidence for this approach it’s common for people to offer that we learn to talk and walk without needing to worry about the exact physical details and usually do so perfectly. Additionally, since we don’t want to think about the details when we perform (we want to concentrate on the musical expression), we should always practice with our attention on the sound alone.
On the other side are the analytical types. According to this extreme, you need to understand exactly how you create the sounds on your instrument and always focus on doing so correctly. By analyzing the details you will learn exactly how to play best the and learn how to make your body perform correctly.
The problem is that these two extreme points of view are not mutually exclusive and, with few exceptions, no one really seems to advocate either to the point of leaving out the other. Continue reading The False Dichotomy – Imitation vs. Process